The dilemma of hospitalization
“Human variations are not open to cure – only to coping.” ― Marius Romme
The United States Community Mental Health Act of 1963 was enacted to facilitate the deinstitutionalisation of costly inpatient psychiatric facilities, integrating treatment within the local community context and into the hands of state and county-led outpatient mental health organizations. This deconstruction of inpatient treatment was attributed to the beginning of the so-called “pharmacological revolution”1, whereby psychotropic medication was prescribed in abundance to chemically lobotomise those who once lived within hospital walls.
With the increase in hyper-conservative political ideology in the second half of the 20th century came a decrease in federal support for the community mental health centers that the 1963 Community Mental Health Act relied on to aid in successful deinstitutionalization2. The ever-decreasing federal and state funding of community mental health services results in unequipped community services reliant on unequipped hospitals in order to handle individual’s who may have more complex and acute needs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de0cd/de0cd34c1b354d0270fdc5cf916edb4d1284d829" alt=""
intended Goals of hospitalization
The goals of inpatient hospitalization include3:
- Suppressing aggression and keeping the individual physically safe
- Supervision over experimenting with type and dosage of medication
- Reducing anxiety (of the individual and/or their support network)
Inpatient hospitalization aims to address these goals utilizing the supports of4:
- Psychiatric and medical evaluation and diagnosing
- Psychiatric medication consultation and adjustments
- Supportive trained staff available 24/7
- Therapeutic support groups
- An environment free of potentially harmful objects or structures
the psychological effects of hospitalization
Many mental health training programs do not teach outpatient providers about how to work with people who live in altered states, which results in an individual potentially having numerous hospitalizations in a short amount of time. This leads to a “revolving door syndrome“5, a continuously re-traumatizing cycle that can lead to “hospitalism”.
Hospitalization often perpetuates a state known as “hospitalism“6, where a person learns to lead a passive life without challenges. Being hospitalized not only strips one of their freedom and independence; it sends a stigmatizing and discriminatory message to the individual (and their support network) that they are ‘out-of-control’ and require outside intervention to change and grow.
Mad in America Podcast: Episode 38
"Jeffrey Michael Friedman, LCSW:
Trauma and Forced Psychiatric Treatment"
“This week on MIA Radio, we interview Jeffrey Michael Friedman, a clinical social worker and an activist in the psychiatric survivor’s movement … In this interview, we discuss why forced psychiatric treatment is a form of trauma and its impact on victims and their families.” (Length: 38 minutes)